The Philosophies Within Macbeth

The Philosophies Within Macbeth The play Macbeth is a historically popular play, with many different themes such iambic pentameter, equivocation, prophetic fallacy, imagery and tones. The statement fair is foul, and foul is fair will be discussed and analysed to see how it is reflected throughout the play. As well as Implicit and explicit meanings will be discussed about characters and objects, to see how they contrast with the statement. Then evaluating the structure, language and style of how the play is written, allowing opinions to be given and supported by evidence. Shakespeare begins the play with the introduction of the witches. They can only be described as ambiguous creatures and questionably human. They create an image of mystery and evil: they will meet When the battle is lost and won (1:1:4), a weird and contradicting statement which resembles their personalities and values. The witches express their evil with their chant and the final couplet, Fair is foul, and foul is fair (1:1:9), this statement violates Gods natural order, because good is bad and bad is good. The witches also give the image of evil by the way they dress and act. They are dressed in black robes and constantly circling each other as they talk and speak in weird rhymes and tones; also the sky is always dark and thunderous when they are present, which is the theme pathetic fallacy. Pathetic fallacy means the attributes of human emotions or characteristics relate to nature. Therefore the thunder and lightning that occur when the witches appear symbolizes they are evil, scary and violent. This runs throughout the play using light and the weather to contrast feelings and emotions of characters, the mood of the moment, as light being seen as fair and the dark being seen as foul. Scene 2 evaporates the shadowy world of the witches from scene one to a physical and masculine world of honour and strength, its travelled from foul to fair. Macbeth doesnt become visible yet, however the Captain and Ross begin describing and personifying him: Disdaining fortune (1:2:17), which means unafraid of his own safety, Valours minion (1:2:19); this gives him the image of a respectable and epic hero; he is a fair warrior. At this point in the play Macbeth is completely in control of himself, a well regarded man and metaphorically a walking God as he is described as, Bellonas bridegroom (1:2:56), a fit husband for the roman Goddess of war. Macbeth and his loyal friend Banquo who is also a highly respectable man encounter the witches. Macbeth states just before they come across the witches, So foul and fair a day I have not seen (1:3:36), this statement echos the witches. Macbeth is stating the weather that its one of those days where fog is followed by sunshine, then a thunderstorm and some hail and more sunshine, all use of prophetic fallacy to create and weird and unsettling image. When the witches are seen, Banquo questions their look, That look not like thinhabitaints othearth and yet are ont? (1:3:39-40), clearly Banquo notices the appearance of the witches, he knows that something weird is happening and cant trust what they say, therefore the feeling from Banquo is pessimistic of the witches and also he acknowledges things not being what they seem. The witches predict to Macbeth and Banquo the future, divulging in information that will turn Macbeth from Fair to Foul. Macbeth is more intrigued, even though Banquo warns Macbeth by saying, instruments of darkness (1:3:123), Macbeth ignores the warning from his friend and is still ambitious on finding more information. Macbeth is beginning to act foul as he is selfish and demands more from the witches. By using dramatic irony the audience knows that these witches are plotting something evil, which can only lead to a disaster. Whereas Banquo is fair knowing the witches are untrustworthy, however he still wants to know their predictions, which is important to his fate, because he also knows the predictions. As the witchs prophecies are told, it is revealed that Macbeth will be thane of Cawdor and King, Macbeth is shocked by this news. Banquo begins by saying, why do you start and seem to fear things that do sound fair?'(1:3:50), the use of fair means good, he is saying to Macbeth, wh y be fearful of these predictions? Maybe Macbeth isnt fearful of these predictions but perhaps already plotting to become king. But Banquo is unhappy that he has not been spoken about, he quizzes the witches, Speak then to me, who neither beg nor fear (1:3:58), when the witches tell Banquo his sons will be king, there is no impression of him being happy with this, instead he says insane root (1:3:82), which means that they have taken something to make them go insane and doesnt believe that what happened is real. The biblical reference here is that Banquo says, What? Can the devil speak true? the witches are being compared to the worst thing possible the devil who is at the bottom of the chain of being; this is giving the real image of how equivocating the witches are, misleading and liars. This statement is also a realization that their predictions are becoming real. A soliloquy is monologue spoken from a character that is alone on stage. The character reveals their inner thoughts and feelings to the audience. It is a useful theme, to understand what the character is thinking. Macbeths Soliloquy begins, Two truths are told (1:3:126), Macbeth has become thane of Cawdor, and is now thinking on how to become king, even with the thought of murder expressed by saying, horrid image (1:3:133), and horrible imaginations (1:3:137) suggest he is thinking of something horrible and possibly murdering Duncan. The soliloquy is powerful, as now we know what he is thinking and feeling, its dramatic irony, as Banquo doesnt know what he is thinking, which creates tension. Macbeth says, Cannot be ill, cannot be good (1:3:130), ill is foul and good is fair Macbeth has acknowledged something unnatural is occurring but because he has, earnest of success, (1:3:131) he is enjoying his new found status and wants more. Banquo, is a smart character, he is suspicious about Macbeth, thou hast it now, king Cawdor, Glamis, all, as the weird women promised, and I fear thou playedst most foully fort'(3:1:1-3), Banquo has acknowledged the foul of Macbeths action, however the fair is, But that myself should be the root and father of many kings'(3:1:5-6), he allows the witches prophecies to be correct in thinking his sons will be king, which shows he is affected by the witches, but in turn this is good, fair as Macbeths sons will not be king. However this is also the time where Banquo is fearful of his own safety knowing he maybe a target as Macbeth could try to kill him and Fleance, Banquos son, to stop him from being king. Macbeth writes a letter to Lady Macbeth which is represented as prose. Shakespeare used prose for the lower status characters such as murderers and servants; however he wasnt afraid to break the rule in letting important characters use it. The letter is entirely appropriate seeing as it is interesting and concise. The letter itself shows love and trust between the relationship of lady Macbeth and Macbeth, Macbeth shows this by saying, my dearest love (1:5:56) and my dearest partner of greatest (1:5:9-10) this shows that Macbeth trusts and loves her. Although it is never mentioned lady Macbeth showing love for Macbeth. I believe that Shakespeare didnt include this, because it would make her look weak. Macbeth is unsure on whether he wants to murder Duncan, she begins plotting straight away; this immediately shows her foul side. Macbeth says I have no spur to prick the sides of my intent (1:7:25-26) which shows his doubts. Lady Macduff has to convince him to do it, by doing so she beco mes almost greater than man or even witch like , Hie thee hither, that I may pour my spirits in thine ear (1,5:24-5) the word spirit is reflective of the witches. She insults Macbeths man hood by calling him a, coward (1:7:43), and beast (1:7:47), these comments, are the worst a man could be called by his wife, this would make him feel humiliated. Macbeth, I dare do all that may become man (1:7:46), as he loves her, he wants to be a man for her. Lady Macbeth also says, how tender tis to love the babe that milks me: I would, while it was smiling in my face, have plucked my nipple from his boneless gums and dashed the brains out (1:7:55-56), This is a massive commitment and promise she is giving to Macbeth, she is so ambitious for Macbeth to kill Duncan shell go to the extent of killing her own baby. This statement is a powerful statement, it questions lady Macbeths humanity and sanity, however she does go on to say, had he not resembled my father as he slept, I had donet (2:3:13), wh en she was being bought up she would have seen her father as a God figure, this is evidence that shows she is fair. Another moment of humanity and of Fair, Macduff encounters her as a, Gentle lady (2:3:77) therefore she is known as a good wife and is gentle, Macduff believes she cant handle the news of murder, which is ironic as she had a part to play in his murder. Is Lady Macbeth greedy or ambitious for Macbeth? Does she want to become queen or does she want him to succeed? I believe that deep down they are both greedy and ambitious, however because Macbeth has become Thane of Cawdor and is a true warrior, he should not progress to try and be king as he is not king material. And I also believe that lady Macbeth wants to be queen so she is forcing Macbeth to kill Duncan out of greed, as I believe she is the type of character which strives for power and people to respect and love her, and by coming queen this is how she can get this power, although it is not said. Duncan is a great and well respected character he also introduces the fair and foul theme, when he talks about the treachery of the Thane of Cawdor, what he hath lost, noble Macbeth has won. (1:2:67) he states that the foul in losing and the fair in wining. The castle where Duncan is killed is described by himself as, This castle hath a pleasant seat; the air nimbly and sweetly recommends itself unto our gentle senses this is ironic as it is where he will die. The castle looks fair pretty, welcoming but its a foul place because Duncan and the two guards were killed. Also Banquos death was plotted in the castle. Before the murder of Duncan, Banquo Struggles to sleep and has reminiscence that something is wrong, this could be the affect of the evil witches on him, when he asks Fleance, How goes the night? (2:1:1) Fleance replies The moon is down; I have not heard the clock (2:1:2). The use of prophetic fallacy is implied to compare the moon to whatever is going on the moon has no part of the evil happenings. Also the imagery when Banquo says, their candles are all out (2:1:5), the metaphor of the light has implied that darkness can only mean evil, and the light symbolizes heaven such as God and angels who will not view what is about the happen. The murder of Duncan, Macbeth sees the image of a knife floating in front of him, its almost he is under a spell being forced to murder Duncan. When Macbeth has murdered Duncan he instantly starts to panic and loses all sense of reality because of the vast crime he has committed in killing a king, who is a god figure to him. He completely transforms straight away, earlier in the play he says jump the life too come (1:7:7). But now the word Amen (1:7:7) cannot said because he has ultimately killed God, They pluck out mine eyes. Will all great Neptunes oceans was this blood clean from my hand? No (2:3:62-63) Gods oceans will not clean him, which suggest a total state of damnation. This makes him unrecognizable to any one, this is where he has become a man without a soul, a lost man and a foul man, when Macbeth kills Duncan the natural order is altered. The porter mentions hell-gate (2:3:1-2) when there is a knocking at the gate of the castle, this becomes a reality it has become a castle of deception, fear, distrust, and the castle is hell. The finding of Duncans body, Lady Macbeth faints on hearing the news, this is where her witch and masculine role beings to recess she slowly starts becoming insane, sleep walking, this a result in her paying for her foul crimes. I believe the fainting suggests its the death of her role. Macbeth becomes king however Macduff doesnt attend his ceremony, this is where I believe Macduff has suspicions of Macbeth, he says suborned (2:4:24) which means bribed, however he knows that Macbeth killed the guards, therefore begins to wonder what really happened. Macbeth gets compared as a the devil himself could not pronounce a title more hateful to mine ear (5:7:8) by young Siward, suggesting there is hell and foul to wherever Macbeth is. Lady Macduff and Lady Macbeth both run off the stage screaming when their deaths occur, although not seen. The even hand of justice is being applied because lady Macduff was brutally murdered along with her son, she is shown as being murdered foully, however the fact that Macduff who is away getting reinforcements to get rid of Macbeth, which is a good and fair. Lady Macbeth who kills herself, people are glad she has done so because of the evil and foul that she conducted in her part in plotting Duncans death, so its giving the impression its fair and a balanced is restored. By representing everything natural is good, by using the Burnham wood, which is moving, it gives the impression its cleansing and replenishing fair reality of nature is cleansing the evil foul which is Macbeth. The final scene brings retribution to Macbeth, Macduff challenges his manhood just like lady Macbeth, which encourages Macbeth to carry on fighting, but he dies courageously, this suggest that Macbeth has returned to his Fair heroic status. The tone during the battle scene is that of a happy ending but yet a tragedy recognised by Macbeth. During the battle Macbeth is in his comfort zone, being a warrior and fighting, yet I will try the last (5:9:71) he has become what he once was at the beginning. He has travelled from fair to foul and foul to fair which is the witches prophecy. During the battle scene, he analysis the witches as juggling fiends (7:6:58) knowing they were the reason he did what he did. However he was warned by Banquo but chose not to listen so will pay for it. When Macduff kills Macbeth the natural order is restored. The theme appearance versus reality, things not being what they seem, human necessarys and luxuries such as food and sleep is a constant theme throughout the play. Macbeth, sleep no more: Macbeth does murder sleep, innocent sleep (2:2:38-9) this is his punishment for his crime a living death, without peace or the ability to rest and sleep. Macbeth becomes jealous of Duncan, in restless ecstasy. Duncan is in his grave resting, after lifes fitful fever, he sleeps well (3:2:23-4), Macbeth who is become increasingly insane as time progresses, this is where I believe Macbeth is debating on whether to kill himself and taking the cowardly way out. Macbeth is foul, for his crime and Duncan is resting, fair. Then the contrast of food, being an important way of keeping fit and strong, Macbeth says, ere we eat our meal in fear (3:2:17), because of the murders he has committed evil and chaos is seeping into his life not letting him live peacefully and enjoying the much needed ideals. Lady Macbet h and Macbeth plot Duncans death during Duncans feast, but plan to murder him during his sleep. Later in the play Macbeth breaks down during a feast as he sees the ghost of Banquo which again disturbs Macbeth from consuming food. Macbeth has realized his crime, he is paying for it, he becomes dependent on his wife to clear the feast, Shakespeare suggest foul and fair with the imagery of food, because Macbeth has committed such a foul crime he is denied the fair of a good diet. The imagery of blood runs through the play, Lady Macbeth says, make thick my blood (1:5:40) her blood is a natural function of the body, and naturally feeds a mans capacity for compassion, things she wishes stops. Also rich imagery of clothes misfitting Macbeth, borrowed robes (1:3:126) strange garments (1:3:145) giving the significance that clothing is powerful and has a hidden meaning, the clothes dont fit Macbeth suggesting that he should not be in them or have the position the clothes represent, such as the crown, which is too big for his head, meaning it should not be there as it is too big, which makes Macbeth look ridiculous. This creates an image of concealment or disguise, as Macbeth begins to hide behind his clothes of kingship. Iambic pentameter is the structure of how Shakespeare chose to write the play. It is poetry that doesnt rhyme and tends to have ten syllables a line. The rhythm of the line comes from the fact that usually every second syllable is emphasised. Its usually the most important words that get stressed such as nouns, names, verbs and actions. This gives the key ideas more prominence and the meanings more power. An example of this is where Macbeth ask, if we should fail (1:7:60) lady Macbeth says, we fail? which could be spoken in many different tones, if spoken flatly suggest what will be will be, but if said loudly and emphasised might sound sarcastic and shock. This theme is also flexible, as some lines only contain four or five syllables, so it is given a space to make up for the time. For example; Macbeth: Two truths are told, As happy prologues to the swelling act (1:3:126-127). The space is left, so the character knows to wait, to keep up with the beat. It is also used to whatever ever mood Shakespeare is trying to capture in the character. Iambic pentameter relates to foul and fair because when the witches speak they are being speaking quickly because of the syllables, gives the impression of scary and evil. The theme equivocation which means, concealing the truth, the intention to mislead and also it creates an image of conflict using words such as fair and foul. As well as using words with double meanings. Its a powerful theme that creates tension, suspense and emotions. Shakespeares uses it all through the play, Lady Macbeth during the speech to Macbeth, about killing Duncan, has many equivocating words such, business (1:6:66) is a double meaning for murder, dispatch (1:6:66) is also another term for murder, she uses these words to not scare Macbeth with direct words as she is unsure on how he would react. To conclude this discussion I believe that foul and fair is strict role throughout the play, where there is foul there is fair, a constant balance of god and bad. Shakespeare used many themes to create imagery and suspense. I believe that Macbeths character was suited to stay as a warrior and not to climax any further, by doing so he suffered for it. Lady Macbeth who remained evil throughout was however a good and strong wife, although suffered for her witch like manner. Macduff is the good guy, although leaving his family alone who got brutally murdered, became the good guy for killing Macbeth.

How Can the Different Ways of Knowing Help Us to Distinguish Between Something That Is True and Something That Is Believed to Be True

How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true? By using different ways of knowing, we can distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true. In order to express these distinctions, personal experiences, their implications, and their counterclaims are needed to be stated. For something to be â€Å"true† it must be public, eternal, and independent. If the â€Å"truth† does not follow these guidelines then it can not be â€Å"true. The ways of knowing that something is â€Å"true† is comprehended by one’s own perception, language, reason and emotion. With these â€Å"ways of knowing† than the â€Å"truth† can, in theory, be understood. Perception is one of the most broad and vague ways of knowing. It is hard for someone and another to have the same â€Å"perception† of an object or event. Take example that Jimmy, a y oung yet intellectual boy who wears glasses, has just seen the biggest bully Bob assault the youngest and smallest kid in school Fred. Their teacher comes over and asks the three boys what happened. According to Bob, Fred fell and received the bruises that way; Fred says that he was attacked by Bob; and Jimmy states that, due to his glasses fogging up, that Bob had inflicted the pain to himself. This vagueness is why the judicial system takes so much time to resolve problems between one party and another. This has implication due our ability to not ever â€Å"know† the whole â€Å"truth†. The cause of not â€Å"knowing,† due to inability to not see â€Å"everything,† leads to the effect of problems between us and our kin based solely on our perception of the events that took place. According to the definition of â€Å"truth† is that it must be public, eternal and independent and thus begins the problems of â€Å"knowing† between Jimmy, Bob, and Fred. The fact that there was a fight and Jimmy watch is public and everyone â€Å"knows† thus the first part of â€Å"truth† is correct. Eternal works as well due to that point in time there was an incident between those three boys. Lastly it was independent from all outside sources, however the problem arises with what is â€Å"true† and who believes that their story is â€Å"true. Bob believes it was not his fault; Fred believes that he was attacked by Bob; and Jimmy believes that Fred did it all to himself. This causes the problem of who â€Å"knows† the â€Å"truth. † The teacher, being unbiased of course, has no real way of â€Å"knowing† who the culprit is based off what the children believe to be â€Å"true†. This has global implications as well for cultures perceive things differently than that of another culture. Take example the United States and Japan; the United States shakes each other hands when greeting someone politely were as in Japan they would bow to each other first. This could cause a massive global conflict if for example the United States offends the Japanese Councilor at the United Nations due to not bowing when greeting. As a counterclaim, someone could say that just using perception as a tool for â€Å"knowing† is simple not enough. Also perception just is not solely based off the ability of someone to see something but the usage of all five senses. The ability to use the five senses would be the correct way in order to learn the â€Å"true. There is no real way of â€Å"knowing† something solely off the assumption of our perception and there is no real â€Å"truth,† rather just a collection of â€Å"believed truths† that we choose to be the â€Å"truth. † Vladimir Lenin stated that â€Å"a lie told often enough become the truth. † We want to believe that we have found the â€Å"truth† and we will not stop look for that â€Å"truth. † Yet how can we communicate this â€Å"knowledge? † Thus we need the usage of language and its imprecations in â€Å"truth. † Language plays an important role in our lives. We created this tool to pass on the â€Å"knowledge† of others, empirical, and thru this we â€Å"learn. † With Vladimir Lenin’s previous quote can be applied to language as well. The winners of wars are the one’s that create the history. It happens to every culture and every civilization that every existed with the ability to record their history. This has global implications that can be recognized off the fact that if a war were to be started and ended than the victory most like would right about how â€Å"morally righteous† their country was and how their opposition, the losing country, was. Now as a counter argument to that claim would be that maybe the country was â€Å"telling the truth† but then we are right back to the beginning in where â€Å"how do we really know what we know? † Can that country account for every action that each one of its civilians, and, or army infantry did during the course of the war? Most likely neither county could. Therefore they can not â€Å"truly know† based off their beliefs or their â€Å"truths. † This in conjecture with perception is adequate but not 100 per cent sufficient in â€Å"knowing† something. We add a third way of knowing: reason. Reasoning skills are a hard thing to explain about it terms of how we â€Å"know† something. Some things can be taught and thus learned by reasoning: putting your hand down on a hot pan thus teaches us to not do it again because it hurts. However when it comes to reasoning skills with moral can be hard to comprehend. One person may see that killing a human is wrong, were as a military general may see the killing of a human a necessity. Bishop Beilby Porteus states that â€Å"one murder made a villain; millions a hero. † Is he telling the â€Å"truth? Do we glorify war? The implication of reasoning is of the greatest importance because it literally comes down to our inner instincts. In contrast how should we let our animalistic emotions control us or should we have a higher level of â€Å"knowledge? † Can any creature or object ever obtain such a thing? Do we or will we ever â€Å"know? † In my option, I believe not; then again what do I â€Å"know? † Emotion is the final piece to the puzzle of knowledge. With the raw passion with what emotion is cannot be simply summed up or described with words along. How can we describe what an emotion is between people? Take for example the emotion of â€Å"love. † One passionate couple may explain there definition of what â€Å"love† is, however if a restaurant owner was asked the same question he or she may say that their â€Å"love† is their restaurant. Hence this gives us the emotion of sympathy towards dictionary writers. Describing such a raw and passionate feeling is incredible. Globally how can one culture translate the emotion of â€Å"love† from one culture to another? Our love could not possibly be the same as someone in Russia or India. Is emotion something that we are born with, or grow into? We will never â€Å"know,† yet this is the final piece of ways of knowing and thus while using all four pieces of â€Å"knowledge† stills leaves us with the belief that we will never â€Å"truly know. † The difference between truth and believed truth can only be answered thru the ways of knowing. The problem is that there is more than one answer. By assuming that there is a finite answer undermines the whole idea of our â€Å"ways of knowing. † The age old question of the creation of life has been the greatest battle between science and religion. Who is to say that one side is â€Å"right† and one side is â€Å"wrong† when we ourselves do not even â€Å"know. † There is no â€Å"obtainable truth†, only the â€Å"truth† that we â€Å"believe to be true. † â€Å"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth. † -Marcus Aurelius How can the ways of knowing help us distinguish between what ‘is true' and what ‘is believed to be true'? â€Å"? i need examples from real life and how you can tell the difference between truth and the believed truth. Best Answer – Chosen by Voters It seems to me that what is true can also be what is believed to be true. Example: the world is not flat. To answer your question, though, look for scientific evidence. For example, some people believe that the earth is only a few thousand years old. Age dating techniques and the fossil record indicate an age of several billion years. 1) Truth is simply the statement of a fact. A fact is something real, whether an object or an occurrence. Consider the following: I say to you â€Å"I ran a marathon,† but you didn't see me run it. Thus the FACT – the ‘truth' – is that I did SAY it; you know that because you were right there. Whether I actually DID run the marathon or not is another question entirely. Did I lie? Did I exaggerate? You can't be sure. And then you go check the records and see that I was registered to run this marathon. You now know that it's true that I was registered, but you still don't know if I actually ran. You might also find witnesses that SAY they saw me running (catching on yet? lol); so you know it's true that those witnesses SAID that they saw me, because you watched them physically speak the words, but you didn't SEE them seeing me, so you still can't be sure I ran. You could, by now, BELIEVE that I ran, but you still don't KNOW it to be true. Now a time-stamped video that clearly shows me running, that might be about the only thing that could convince you that I truly did run†¦ although that could be doctored†¦ It all comes down to the level of evidence you're personally willing to trust. Do you trust a scientist's data? Do you trust a priest's truthfulness? (And don't get me started on God and faith lol) (And don't get me started on your textbooks, either) The difference between what ‘is true' and what is ‘believed to be true' in the Arts? This could be in painting, art, or english I have an essay to wrote about: â€Å"How can the ways of knowing (language, perception, reason, emotion) help us distinguish between what ‘is true' and what ‘is believed to be true'? † apply this question with examples in the Arts 1) I see art as a representation of reality or a mimic or mirror and the representaitons set at different levels, standards or views depending on who is presenting in whatever form. I see truth as having different levels as well. What we call something is indeed what we call it like a flower is red or whatever. Then there are all sorts of cause and effect relatinships that are indirect or direct cause and effect. One thing can be caused by many things acting together to cause it or a sequence of events and it can make it tough to find the true or the first or most significant root cause (to solve the problem). Mostly, one has to see something to its conclusion to find out what is true vs. what is false, what is consistant vs. hat is inconsistant. Sometimes what is believed is actually true and sometimes what is believed is actually false. Experience is such a great teacher! I guess these ideas can be represented in the arts in various ways in colors, masks, shadows, inconsistancies, demeanor, etc. Some of it left open to interpretation just as art imitates life. We all have the need to believe things we think are true and might also turn out to be true. It is wh at life is about mostly, faith. I don't know if I answered your question or not, but that is what I think so far. ) the difference between what ‘is true' and what is ‘believed to be true' in the arts is the same as that of what is true and what is believed to be true in any other field. you will apply the value ‘true' to that which you can empirically evidence (the type of oil the artist used in a particular painting or the economy of words of a certain novel) and you will apply ‘believed to be true' to that which may or may not be true (evidenced) depending on the individual involved (the feeling of melancholy the particular painting evokes). guess my feeling is that anything highly susceptible to subjectivity isn't really there to help us to distinguish but will serve greatly to enhance our experience of the thing (the objet d'art) itself. Source(s): i don't know a great deal about the philosophy of art nor about the art of philosophy but your question stru ck me as interesting. †¢ Read Karl Popper â€Å"take' on this. He correctly identified the â€Å"arts from â€Å"science†,and in doing so realised that all our knowledge ,in Both(! ), was really â€Å"Suspect†. Hence he became famous for the modern way-of-using and deciphering just how real(or knowledge based) â€Å"criticism† can enable all the mistakes-within Science and even the Arts-†¦. to †¦.. be†¦. learned†¦. from ! (and if you study his work,you should quite easily see that serious-and-dangerous mistakes SHOULD NOT BE MADE. So†¦ this is almost the sole â€Å"point† to our -all our-traditions. That we CAN learn from our mistakes(E. g. in the Arts as well as in the sciences), and even gain a glimmer of good,critical knowledge from those previously,dangerous and deadly ones,too. And†¦. after rereading the above†¦ i think its a virtual responsibility of the arts, to HELP IN THIS; and one obvious modern way is for artists everywhere to â€Å"look† at the current serious and dangerous mistake(s) being made with our environment- and this is just one ONE example that i can think of here;(and although works-of-art should,i think be direc ted to show awarness of this type-of-real-complex problem;i do NOT think that the Arts should promote the breaking-of-laws,ecetera. Rather,the Arts should â€Å"take-our-minds† to new places,to new and better ideas,especially so when in search-of better solutions to the above problem-and other critical problems,too! ). Source(s): The work of the late scholar,teacher and philosopher; Sir Karl. R. Popper, et al. Are Some Ways Of Knowing More Likely Than Others To Lead To Truth? In this essay I will discuss whether some ways of knowing are more like than others to lead to the truth. There is no single definition of the truth where every philosopher agrees with. What we can say is that the truth is ne of the most important elements in our society which extends from â€Å"honesty, good faith and sincerity in general to agreement with fact or reality in particular†. Instead of just concentrating on the four ways of knowing, language, perception, reason and emotion, I will also look at the areas of knowledge, such as sciences and mathematics to help finding which of the four ways of knowing is the most lik ely to lead to the truth. To answer the research question, we first have to look at the truth itself. In a dictionary is said that truth is â€Å"The degree to which a statement corresponds with reality and logic †. Every human being defines truth in a different way. Truth can be what one is prepared to accept as truth, as well as something which is proved by a study for being true or what for example the media, books, government and yourself name to be true. In the first area of knowledge I will discuss, the sciences, truth will always change during the time. A good example is Isaac Newton’s theory of mechanics and universal gravitation. In this time everyone believed his theory describing the universe as being â€Å"true† and there was no evidence for it being not the truth. Than after some centuries some scientist discovered things where Newton’s theory didn’t account for. Therefore his theory was than called â€Å"untrue† and Albert Einstein’s evidence which fitted more into these discoveries was named as being true. This is evidence therefore, that science is a process, the truth will always change in time, but in this particular time period the truth cannot be named as â€Å"untrue† because it cannot be disproved by knowledge or technology. On the other hand in mathematics, one has these principles like â€Å"1 + 1 = 2† or â€Å"2 + 2 = 4†. People do not†¦ ‘ All Of The Other Ways Of Knowing Are Controlled By Language. What Does This Statement Mean And Do You Think It Is A Fair Representation Of The Relationship Between Perception, Emotion, Reason And Language? Language is such a universal phenomenon in human society. Whenever we write or speak, we use it; whenever we make a promise or ask a question, we use it. In the statement ?  §All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language , language is defined as ?  §words and this ?  §control can be defined as ?  §dominate. Then this saying seems not so fair to represent the relationship between the four ways of knowing. It is more sensible to say language gives some support or limit to our reason? Aperception and emotion. It may influence them, but not only one way ? V the four ways of knowing interact with each other. The function of language is particularly relevant in reason. We should believe our application of reason is within our mind before we express it into words. Most natural science is called logic facts and we often use the name of theories to represent our reason instead of explaining the essence in details. For example, if your hand pushes against the edge of a desk, the desk pushes against your hand. Probably we will tell others this phenomenon is because ?  §Newton?  ¦s third law of motion but won?  ¦t explain the content of this theory word by word. In this case, language has no meaning itself, but it is more like a symbol to represent reason. Another example is ?  §Chaos Theory. Ten years ago, Chaos is just a simple English word, but as Chaos theory become part of modern science, people easily associate the idea of finding the order in random data? when they see the word ?  §Chaos. However, reason requires precision. Scientists use scientific language to give strict definition of a theory before they name it. Newton?  ¦s third law of motion states: ?  §Whenever one object exerts a force on a second object, the second exerts an equal and opposite force on the first. (Isaac Newton 1687) People must have the sense of reaction before this theory is built, but it needs a m edium to become verbalized and communicated in order to evaluate its validity†¦. Best Answer – Chosen by Voters The â€Å"how† of something that is believed true is called â€Å"justified true belief. † (Google it) On the other hand, another way of knowing â€Å"how† something is true or not is called the â€Å"correspondence theory of truth,† wherein everything is true or false according to the context in which you are using the word, phrase, or premise. The correspondence theory can be described this way: â€Å"The degree to which our metaphysical worldview is correct is the degree to which we are able to comprehend the world, and act accordingly. Without this firm foundation, all knowledge becomes suspect. Any flaw in our view of reality will make it more difficult to live. † http://www. importanceofphilosophy. com/Me†¦ http://www. iep. utm. edu/truth/#H3 How Can The Different Ways Of Knowing Help Us To Distinguish Between Something That Is True And Something That Is Believed To Be True? 4. How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true? â€Å"We create knowledge ourselves, through the four ways of knowing;† (Dombrowski, 91-92) sense perception, language, reasoning and emotion. These ways of knowing are also the means by which knowledge claims are judged for their credibility, validity and most importantly, their likelihood to be true. When a knowledge claim is made, three scenarios are presented with the least problematic being that the claim is false based on the four ways of knowing coupled with past experiences. A claim is not said to be true just because it is false. The aim of this essay will be to illuminate how certainty, confidence and the convincing nature of claims distinguish between claims believed to be true and claims that are known to be true. True† and â€Å"false†, in simplicity, can be viewed as divisors for separating knowledge claims or beliefs but in reality, we view â€Å"true† and â€Å"false† as the extreme boundaries of a scale that determines with reason whether or not claims should be accepted as true or not. In history, where we make value claims, â€Å"Claims that embed evaluations on a scale that is not calibrated in measurable units† (Dombrowski, 106), there seems to be a lot of subjectivity as these claims themselves are subjective. They hold some truth because they are actually made from observational claims. In the story of Nazi Anschluss with Austria, where a plebiscite was held to ask whether Austria wanted to become a part of Nazi Germany and the Nazi’s â€Å"claim to have received 99. 73% of the vote† (â€Å"Anschluss†), two value claims that could come out will be that the Austrians loved Nazis and wanted to be a part of it or that the Austrians feared Nazi Germany and did not have any other option than to be part of Nazis. These two opinions show the subjective nature of such areas but these statements cannot be taken as false. The fact that there is†¦ 1. No comments Join Now For Free

Reduce stress

There have various way to reduce stress such as listen to music , exercises regularly and have a good relationship with other people. Topic sentence 1 : Firstly, listen to music can reduce stress. Supporting details 1 : different person have different favorite music genre, but the most effective in other to reduce stress is listen to slow and classic music. Supporting details 2 : furthermore, music can lowering blood pressure, and decreasing the levels of stress hormones. Supporting details 3 : Listening to music can relieve depression and increase self-esteem ratings in elderly people. Topic sentence 2 : secondly, exercises regularly can reduce stress Supporting details 1 : in other to reduce stress need to have exercises at lease 3 days a week, when done exercises, sweats release with negative energy from our body and keep our mind in balance. Supporting details 2 : Otherwise, exercises can keep our body healthy and away from diseased. Supporting details 3 : to avoid feel boring with the same activity we can change our regular exercise from gimnasium to swimming, dancing, cycling, playing badminton or other extreme sports like wall climbing, and jugle tracking. Topic sentence 3 : finally, have a good relationship with other people Supporting details 1 : get to know about our friends and be socialized. Supporting details 2 : have a good sense of humor and sometimes make jokes with friends in office. Supporting details 3 : must have at least one best friend that can express any problems, always make parents as the best person to find any problem solve because they always know the best for us.

Manifest Destiny - 1327 Words

Manifest Destiny is a term used to describe the reason behind the US expansion into the West. What are the social, political and economical effects of this idea on the people living in the United States colonies and the West? Manifest Destiny is a term coined by John L. Sullivan in 1845 when talking about the annexation of Texas. He believed, along with other expansionists, that it’s inevitable that the US population would spread across North America because the land is given by Providence to the United States and that it’s natural that the land should be part of the country [Doc 1]. The idea of westward expansion and Manifest Destiny had positive and negative effects on the politics, society and the economics of the United States and†¦show more content†¦John Burnett witnessed the helpless Cherokees pulled from their homes and driven at bayonet point. They were herded into wagons and headed westward. Most of the Cherokee people did not have sufficient cover to protect against the harsh climate. By the time the westward journey ended, four thousand Cherokees had died all because the whites wanted their land. The Cherokee sent an envoy to Jackson to which Jackson decreed that all of their land must be given to the white people [Doc 3]. In addition to the social and political changes that impacted the Indians, there were changes aimed at the economy which also negatively affected the Indians. One act that negatively affected the Indians was the Pacific Railway Act of 1862. This act was created to help the construction of a railroad and telegraph lines from the Missouri River to the Pacific Ocean. Permission was given to the company creating the railroad that they can take away any land touching that of which the railroad is to be built on within 200 feet in width. Although the railroad was a great impact of Manifest Destiny because it allowed for quicker transportation of goods and people to and from the west, it legally allowed for Indian land titles to be extinguished [Doc 7]. However, there were many positive economic aspects for American citizens who were moving westward. The Homestead Act of 1862 was an incentive for people to moveShow MoreRelatedEssay On Manifest Destiny1709 Words   |  7 Pagesone of many seminal events in the history of the United States. However, it began the debt we are still in today; the Louisiana Purchase gave us the land that began the Manifest Destiny. â€Å"The term Manifest Destiny originated in the 1840’s when John L. O’Sullivan said in an article that it was the American colonist’s Manifest Destiny to spread over the continent and that God had given them the land for the sole purpose of multiplying and free development.† (History.com staff). It was this philosophyRead MoreThe Manifest Destiny Essay1076 Words   |  5 Pagesfull swing by the 1840s. Which evidenced that the continued expansion of the states was an issue and the idea of a Manifest Destiny was of major importance. John L. O’Sullivan once stated, â€Å"Our Manifest Destiny is to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions† (America: A Narrative History). The idea of a Manifest Destiny originated in the 1840s by the Anglo-Saxon Colonists to expand their ideal civilization and institutions across NorthRead MoreManifest Destiny : Ideal Or Justification Essay883 Words   |  4 PagesManifest destiny: Ideal or Justification The Louisiana Purchase doubled the size of U.S in 1803. But it is not enough for ambitious Americans, we are not satisfied, we wanted more territory. So western expansion did not end, it actually keep moved. Westward Expansion is a very significant part in U.S history. It operated perfectly based on the ideology called manifest destiny. However, the creation of this theory is on purpose. It was used to push U.S territory to further west. When the idea of manifestRead MoreManifest Destiny Is An American Philosophy Essay2281 Words   |  10 Pages Manifest Destiny is an American philosophy with which it is to justify how that country has understood their place in the world and how to relate to other people. It is a doctrine, phrase or idea that expresses the belief that the United States is destined to spread to the four winds as supports the idea that is, to expand on the territories conquered North America and, in general, on the Western Hemisphere. This doctrine was not free of racism, considering that the American people wereRead MoreManifest Destiny Research Paper :1382 Words   |  6 Pages2014 Manifest Destiny Research Paper: The 1840’S were years of unprecedented growth for United States; in a mere four years, the national domain more than doubled with an additional 1.2 million miles being added to the country. (PBS) This was due to a movement called Manifest Destiny that suggested that the United States was â€Å"destined† to stretch from coast, sea to shining sea, uninterrupted by anything or anyone. (History.com) However, complex and underlying motives guided Manifest Destiny advocatesRead MoreManifest Destiny And Westward Expansion Essay1447 Words   |  6 Pages1) OUTLINE: I. Topic sentence. Manifest destiny and westward expansion was a tremendous key component to the growth of the nation economically because of the impact it had on native americans, women empowerment, and expanding the population of the country. II. Significance of topic. Americans looked towards the western lands as an opportunity for large amounts of free land, for growth of industry, and pursue the manifest destiny. III. List of evidence related to topic. The railwaysRead MoreManifest Destiny: Term or Reality Essay1315 Words   |  6 PagesThe three authors that describe Manifest destiny have very different beliefs but all use one person with vastly different views on Manifest Destiny and his beliefs on the term. The person that first used the term in any form of writing was John O’ Sullivan and is accredited with coining the phrase but much of this time had this strong belief in expanding the territory and states of the United States. Their views on this term were different because some believed that the United States should expandRead MoreExplain The Background, And Repercussions Of Manifest Destiny1956 Words   |  8 PagesExplain the background, and repercussions of, Manifest Destiny. In 1845, John O’Sullivan wrote an Article in the ‘United States Magazine and Democratic Review’ in favor of the annexation of Texas. In this article the term ‘Manifest Destiny’ was created. O’Sullivan wrote â€Å"the fulfilment of our Manifest Destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.† Thus supplying the American people with the idea that it was their God-givenRead MoreManifest Destiny, By John L. Sullivan1491 Words   |  6 PagesIt is hard to read anything about the history of the United States without coming across the term â€Å"Manifest Destiny†. Manifest Destiny is a term, which was first coined by John L. Sullivan in the summer 1845 issue of the Democratic Review. â€Å"Hence it was carried into the debate on the Oregon question in the House of Representatives and proved to be such a convenient summing up of the self-confident nationalist and expansionist sentiment of the time that it passed into the permanent national vocabularyRead MoreInsight about the Mexican War and the Manifest Destiny Essay1046 Words   |  5 Pagesthe Mexican War and how did it begin? or What is Manifest Destiny and who came up with it? Those are all very good questions, so let me take the time to give you some insight about the Mexican war and Manifest Destiny. The Manifest Destiny was the belief that the United States was destined to expand from coast to coast. It was the concept that which heavily influenced American policy in the 1800s. Americans supported the manifest destiny because the Southerners wanted more land and Northerners